Printer friendly version |  E-mail to a friend 
| Text Size: A A A A
 
Published Thursday, January 15, 2009 6:05 AM

Fertilizer prices spur caution

Buy a print
Eagle photo/Dave McDermand
Farmer Joe Wilder has pesticide tanks on his farm off F.M. 166 in Brazos County.
Buy a print
Eagle photo/Stuart Villanueva
Potassium and other ingredients for fertilizer are stacked in the fertilizer mixing room at the Producers Co-Op Associates in Bryan.
Buy a print
Eagle photo/Dave McDermand
Farmer Joe Wilder inspects the dozens of hoses that connect to pesticide dispersal units lining the bottom of his sprayer.

Farmers and ranchers are casting a wary eye on fertilizer costs because of continuing price volatility in commodities and the overall economic uncertainties that blanket America's landscape.

"We changed our whole program up. We're cutting back on cotton and grain sorghum acreage and anything that uses a lot of fertilizer," said Joe Wilder, who has been farming and raising cattle in the Brazos Valley for more than 40 years.

For decades, cotton has been the main crop on the Wilder family farm. But Wilder made the tough decision last fall to convert 70 percent of his cotton acreage to soybeans and winter wheat crops, which require less fertilizer.

Wilder buys fertilizer in the fall, when prices are traditionally low. In September, he paid more than $500 a ton for fertilizer. At that price, he bought only enough to get row crops up and growing.

He says he'll wait as long as he can before he buys more; he's not going to tie all his money up in high-priced fertilizer.

He also spread fertilizer over most of the farm's grazing pastures.

"I think ranchers are the same way. We fertilized most of our pastures this year. We're going to wait and see what the price does before we do any more," Wilder said. "Looking at the price of cattle, I don't know if we can do it."

Numerous factors have affected the price of fertilizer, including a weak dollar, continuing consolidation of fertilizer and chemical companies, bankruptcies, U.S. corn-planting acreage and overseas fertilizer demand and production.

Prices for fertilizer stocks started climbing in the fall of 2007 and reached record highs in the first six months of 2008. Urea was selling for $800 a ton, phosphorus hit $1,200 a ton and potash also was expensive. Prices got so high that many producers stopped buying. Now, some wholesale companies have an abundance of fertilizer mixture inventories sitting on offshore barges. These companies bought stocks while prices were high, and they will lose money if they sell now.

"Our movement has been decimated. We've lost 42 percent of the [retail] demand in Texas, down from 2005," said Toby Hlavinka of East Bernard, a regional fertilizer manager for the Southern United States for Helena Chemical Co.

He said barge prices for ingredients such as diammonium phosphate -- a source of nitrogen -- peaked at $1,100 a ton and by August had hit $280 a ton. Phosphate prices have been cut a third from their summer peak. Nitrogen prices continue to adjust downward at nearly half their peak price, and potash prices should be substantially down. Dry fertilizer has been quick to go down, whereas liquid has not, Hlavinka said.

Although prices have plummeted, a rally in corn prices could push up prices again, he said.

Hlavinka said it could take the entire spring season to pull fertilizer inventories down to historic levels.

Factors such as drought, hurricanes, flooding in the Midwest and cattle prices also have added to marketplace volatility.

"I've got cattle people that bought 125 truckloads before and bought six truckloads this year," he said.

Market volatility in the agricultural and financial sectors will continue to create uncertainties for farmers and ranchers when making risk-management decisions.

"Our people in Texas are very risk-adverse. They control risk," Hlavinka said. "I think 2009 is going to be a very different time in this industry."

Wilder says that in his 40 years of growing crops and raising cattle, he's never experienced such a volatile economy.

"We're not going to spend any money that we don't have to this year. It's kind of frightening," he said of the economy. "We're going to be real conservative. We've got to."




Notice about comments: Theeagle.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Theeagle.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not theeagle.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here. The Eagle is proud to offer our users enhanced commenting features. You can now build user-to-user connections, follow friend's recent posts, add an avatar that fits your personality, and more. If you have posted here before you’ll need to sign up again and if you’ve never posted start now by signing up!
Comments
[comment]
0 comment(s) found!




 
The Eagle's Most Popular
  • Commented
  • Emailed
  • Viewed

Top Ads
  • Jobs
  • Cars
  • Homes
  • Merchandise
Straw Poll
Bryan and College Station school districts have scheduled the 2010-2011 school year to begin Aug. 23. What do you believe the school start date should be?
  • The latter part of August.
  • After Labor Day.
  • Unsure.

Disclaimer: The Eagle's polls are not based on scientifically valid survey methodology. They are merely a way to allow readers to express opinions on current events.

© 2009 The Bryan College Station Eagle
Contact Us | Subscribe/Customer Care | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | FAQ | Corrections | RSS Feeds | E-mail News