Printer friendly version |  E-mail to a friend 
| Text Size: A A A A
 
Published Sunday, July 05, 2009 12:09 AM

Official: A&M research posts will stay split

Merging the top research spots at the Texas A&M University System and Texas A&M University is not under consideration, says Brett Giroir, the system's vice chancellor for research.

"That's just not on the table," Giroir told The Eagle during an editorial board meeting last week, addressing concerns that the system's vice chancellor for research and the university's vice president for research positions would be combined. "We have no intention of taking over research administration."

He said that in his conversations with Texas A&M System Chancellor Mike McKinney he had "never, ever gotten the impression" that McKinney wanted to move the university's research administration under the vice chancellor's control.

Giroir, who previously held a director position at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency in Washington, D.C., said he had spoken several times with Jeffrey Seemann, the incoming vice president for research, who began work last week. Giroir said Seemann, a former dean at the University of Rhode Island, is great for the job.

He said his and Seemann's responsibilities are distinct. Seemann is the university's research chief, while Giroir has more of a "30,000-foot view," he said, in which he oversees the efforts of the entire system of 11 universities, seven state agencies and a health science center.

"I want to be the matchmaker ... I'm eHarmony for researchers," he said, referring to the online service. "My personal opinion is, these are two separate positions."

Since the Board of Regents approved a plan to examine how to merge certain functions between the 48,000-student flagship campus and the system that governs it, many Texas A&M faculty and administrators have expressed concern that the system was trying to take over the university's research administration.

Less than two weeks before the June 15 regents meeting, a performance evaluation of former A&M President Elsa Murano was released in which McKinney wrote that Murano had failed to acknowledge her commitment to the Board of Regents and the chancellor regarding "VPR; Research Foundation." Murano announced her resignation June 14.

System officials haven't explained what that "VPR" reference meant.

"VPR" is the acronym commonly used in university and system circles for the flagship's vice president for research. Murano conducted a national search spearheded by a committee that led to Seemann's hiring.

Giroir also was a candidate for A&M's vice president for research. As the search advisory committee began looking for the new leader, both McKinney and Murano had conversations with Giroir, he said.

The day before Murano officially became president on Jan. 3, 2008, she invited him for an on-campus interview, Giroir said.

Giroir said he began browsing the Texas A&M University Web site, learning about Vision 2020 and everything else he could. It was while he was online a few weeks later, he said, that he learned that Murano had formed a committee to search for the next vice president for research.

Giroir said he called Murano and told her he didn't feel right about being interviewed by the president while the committee was conducting its search.

Giroir, who was McKinney's choice to become the vice president for research, said that a short while later -- in late January or early February -- Murano met with him in Washington. Murano's chief of staff, H. Russell Cross, also was present at the meeting, Giroir said, adding that he didn't see it as a job interview but felt positive afterward about his job prospects.

On April 1, McKinney and Regent Bill Jones, who was then board chairman, met with Giroir in Washington and for the first time discussed the vice chancellor for research position at the Texas A&M System, Giroir said. At the time, the system's research duties were carried out by Guy Diedrich, who held the title of vice chancellor for federal relations, the system's Office of Technology Commercialization and research.

The position was posted shortly afterward, Giroir said. He applied, was offered the job by the chancellor and was formally approved by the Board of Regents on April 23, 2008.

Meanwhile, the search for Texas A&M University vice president for research continued. According to Giroir's account, about a week later, a search firm working with the search committee asked Giroir whether he would be willing to give up the vice chancellor for research position to serve as the flagship university's vice president for research.

He said he would not and was informed the next month that he was no longer in the running for vice president for research.

The VPR search -- which ended the first time in failure last July when the candidate the committee settled on declined an offer -- eventually produced three candidates whose names were forwarded to Murano and Provost Jeffrey Vitter. They selected Seemann.

Seemann, who officially began work Wednesday, will earn a salary of $280,000. After a request for an interview with The Eagle, Seemann replied in a statement through a spokeswoman.

"I have spoken with Interim President [R. Bowen] Loftin and Vice Chancellor Giroir, and they have confirmed to me that there is no plan to merge the VCR and VPR positions," Seemann said.

"As the new Vice President for Research at Texas A&M University, I look forward to working with faculty, administrators, and other partners in the research community to enhance and grow our already very successful research enterprise."




Notice about comments: Theeagle.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Theeagle.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not theeagle.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here. The Eagle is proud to offer our users enhanced commenting features. You can now build user-to-user connections, follow friend's recent posts, add an avatar that fits your personality, and more. If you have posted here before you’ll need to sign up again and if you’ve never posted start now by signing up!
Comments
[comment]
4 comment(s) found!


Posted by: Aggie Supporter On: Sunday, July 05, 2009 8:02 PM

Comment Title: great!
It seems to me that the vote of "no confidence" has had a beneficial though unacknowledged effect on the chancellor. Seemann's comment, "I have spoken with Interim President [R. Bowen] Loftin and Vice Chancellor Giroir, and they have confirmed to me that there is no plan to merge the VCR and VPR positions," indicates a clear change in plans at the system level. If this holds true, there's some cause for celebration, especially if the timeline for a new president is expanded and a legitimate search takes place. Of course, the chancellor and the BOR will deny that the faculty votes had any influence at all. Let them.
Report Abuse
Posted by: A concerned faculty On: Sunday, July 05, 2009 6:25 PM

Comment Title: Unnecessary Mess
Here's another example of how the Chancellor is unfamiliar with the academic search and selection processes and thus has deserved the no-confidence vote of the faculty. There is a well-established tradition in academia to let a search committee find probable prospects for a high-level position. The usual means are to advertise and to proactively encourage qualified people to apply. Once all prospects are in, the committee deliberates using all information at its disposal - the candidates' track records, reference letters, and preliminary interviews, if needed . That is absolutely not the time for the Chancellor or any other administrator to interfere or influence the process by showing their preference for candidates. Once finalists have been recommended, the Chancellor can use his best judgment to select one candidate to recommend to the BOR. However, a Chancellor like McKenney who has no experience in research administration should have fully relied on the committee's recommendation and kept himself at a distance. The fundamental problem that has been the cause of all this mess is that the Chancellor has no qualifications to administer a research university. In fact he would not himself survive any search process for a high level administrative position at A&M or at any reputed research university. Just look at credentials of any administrator who has been through a search process, such as Provost Vitter or the new vice president of research. These are people who have glorious research track records themselves. It is an insult to these people's accomplishments to be asking them to report to a person who is a mere physician, and tragically, has no sophistication of a learned person. The damage done to A&M by appointing a person of insufficient qualifications as Chancellor is much greater than most people know or realize. The Chancellor has appointed two Vice Chancellors as Deans at A&M, without the usual process. These people carry out the same flawed practice by appointing their associates who like themselves have insufficient qualifications. The virus has infected all over in the two colleges. It is time to clean up the mess. The harm being done is immeasurable.
Report Abuse
Posted by: a loyal aggie On: Sunday, July 05, 2009 5:07 PM

Comment Title: More window dressing????
Indeed, Dr. Giroir appears skilled at damage control and the System is clearly making an effort to mollify its critics. We'll have to see whether actions are consistent with words. However, these are the most curious words in the above story: "Giroir told The Eagle during an editorial board meeting last week." Does this mean that the system administration is meeting with the Eagle's editorial board to suggest how stories are to be framed? We've seen a long, long history here not only of rhetorical and other gestures that amount to administrative window dressing, but of the suppression of negative (or might we say, often truthful) accounts of University activities. Following a bit of initial investigative reporting, KBTX appears to have been cowed into submission, or at least slipped into silence where the current campus controversy is concerned. Will the Eagle continue what has been its energetic and responsible reporting, or will it also retreat into a suspicious silence???
Report Abuse
Posted by: AL On: Sunday, July 05, 2009 8:53 AM

Comment Title: Giroir is the read deal
Dr. Giroir is an extremely capable individual who has handled himself well through this challenging time. I am very optimistic that he will prove a great team matte for our VP for research and that we will have the most effective "Research eHarmony" tag team in the nation! Hang in there, Dr. Giroir. You have shown quiet class that will serve us all well in the future.
Report Abuse


 
The Eagle's Most Popular
  • Commented
  • Emailed
  • Viewed

Top Ads
  • Jobs
  • Cars
  • Homes
  • Merchandise
 
 
Straw Poll
The Bryan school board is again discussing whether to require students to wear uniforms. Do you like the idea of student uniforms?
  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure

Disclaimer: The Eagle's polls are not based on scientifically valid survey methodology. They are merely a way to allow readers to express opinions on current events.

© 2009 The Bryan College Station Eagle
Contact Us | Subscribe/Customer Care | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | FAQ | Corrections | RSS Feeds | E-mail News