Your SEO optimized title

Senate leaders vow to strike down House spending measure as shutdown looms - The Eagle: News

Senate leaders vow to strike down House spending measure as shutdown looms

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Monday, September 30, 2013 12:00 am

WASHINGTON -- With the government teetering on the brink of partial shutdown, congressional Republicans vowed Sunday to keep using an otherwise routine federal funding bill to try to attack the president's health care law.

Congress was closed for the day after a post-midnight vote in the GOP-run House to delay by a year key parts of the new health care law and repeal a tax on medical devices, in exchange for avoiding a shutdown. The Senate was to convene Monday afternoon, just hours before the shutdown deadline, and Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., had already promised that majority Democrats would kill the House's latest volley.

Since the last government shutdown 17 years ago, temporary funding bills known as continuing resolutions have been noncontroversial, with neither party willing to chance a shutdown to achieve legislative goals it couldn't otherwise win. But with health insurance exchanges set to open on Tuesday, tea-party Republicans are willing to take the risk in their drive to kill the health care law.

Action in Washington was limited mainly to the Sunday talk shows and a barrage of press releases as Democrats and Republicans rehearsed arguments for blaming each other if the government in fact closes its doors at midnight Monday.

"You're going to shut down the government if you can't prevent millions of Americans from getting affordable care," said Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md.

"The House has twice now voted to keep the government open. And if we have a shutdown, it will only be because when the Senate comes back, Harry Reid says, 'I refuse even to talk,'" said Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, who led a 21-hour broadside against allowing the temporary funding bill to advance if stripped clean of a tea party-backed provision to derail Obamacare. The effort failed.

The battle started with a House vote to pass the short-term funding bill with a provision that would have eliminated the federal dollars needed to put President Barack Obama's health care overhaul into place. The Senate voted along party lines to strip that out and lobbed the measure back to the House.

The latest House measure, passed early Sunday by a near party-line vote of 231-192, sent back to the Senate two key changes: a one-year delay of key provisions of the health insurance law and repeal of a new tax on medical devices that partially funds it, steps that still go too far for The White House and its Democratic allies on Capitol Hill.

Senate rules often make it difficult to act quickly, but the chamber can act on the House's latest proposals by simply calling them up and killing them.

Eyes were turning to the House for its next move. One of its top leaders vowed the House would not simply give in to Democrats' demands to pass the Senate's "clean" funding bill.

"The House will get back together in enough time, send another provision not to shut the government down, but to fund it, and it will have a few other options in there for the Senate to look at again," said the No. 3 House Republican leader, Rep. Kevin McCarthy of California. "We are not shutting the government down."

U.S. Rep. Bill Flores, a Bryan businessman who represents District 17, said he's not a "big fan" of the government shutting down, but fell short of saying how he will vote Monday.

"I can't say for sure," he said, adding that it depends on what's in the bill that returns to the House.

Like many of his colleagues on both sides of the aisle, the Republican blamed the opposing political party for the problem.

"The American people do not like Obamacare by large majorities -- it's hurting businesses throughout, and as a result we are trying to get that law stopped," he said in a telephone interview late Sunday. "All we're asking is to delay it a year, and the president has already delayed some parts of it."

Asked what he thought of the frustration his constituents feel as members of the Legislature continue to squabble, Flores replied: "Washington is fairly dysfunctional. We do have a divided government, which reflects the population in the US and as a result we have this outcome of the division. It's hard to find the intersection."

He said he hasn't tried to negotiate with Democrats "lately," and didn't know the "exact number" of employees locally who will be impacted by a shutdown, other than it would be "a lot."

Democrats said the GOP's bravado may fade as the deadline to avert a shutdown nears.

Republicans argued that Reid should have convened the Senate on Sunday to act on the measure.

"If the Senate stalls until Monday afternoon instead of working today, it would be an act of breathtaking arrogance by the Senate Democratic leadership," said House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio. "They will be deliberately bringing the nation to the brink of a government shutdown."

In the event lawmakers blow the Monday deadline, about 800,000 workers would be forced off the job without pay. Some critical services such as patrolling the borders, inspecting meat and controlling air traffic would continue. Social Security benefits would be sent, and the Medicare and Medicaid health care programs for the elderly and poor would continue to pay doctors and hospitals.

The Senate was not scheduled to meet until midafternoon Monday, 10 hours before a shutdown would begin, and even some Republicans said privately they feared that Reid held the advantage in the fast-approaching end game.

Republicans argued that they had already made compromises; for instance, their latest measure would leave intact most parts of the health care law that have taken effect, including requiring insurance companies to cover people with pre-existing conditions and to let families' plans cover children up to age 26. They also would allow insurers to deny contraception coverage based on religious or moral objections.

Tea party lawmakers in the House -- egged on by Cruz -- forced GOP leaders to abandon an earlier plan to deliver a "clean" stopgap spending bill to the Senate and move the fight to another must-do measure looming in mid-October: a bill to increase the government's borrowing cap to avert a market-rattling, first-ever default on U.S. obligations.

Eagle reporter Beth Brown contributed to this report.

© 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.

3 comments:

  • BB posted at 11:25 am on Sat, Oct 5, 2013.

    BB Posts: 13

    Our government is comprised of three independent branches of Government. However, in addition to the Administrative Branch, the President appears to be running half of the legislative branch too (Senate). At the President's insistence, the Senate continues to refuse to make any attempt to reconcile their budget with any of the three alternative version bills passed by the House.
    Given the Democratic position of my way or nothing, I don't see why Obama is walking the streets of DC instead of attending the Asia Summit. Could it be that he doesn't want to avail himself of another international embarrassment from his peers.

     
  • Sabio posted at 9:00 pm on Mon, Sep 30, 2013.

    Sabio Posts: 1700

    Let's see. The "People's House" has passed bills rejecting Obamacare again and again. Why is it that the Senate and its Democrat leadership seen as the obstructionists when they continue to reject bills supported by the MAJORITY of the most representative body in America?!?!

     
  • chas holman posted at 1:13 am on Mon, Sep 30, 2013.

    chas holman Posts: 26

    I am so weary of the GOT's antics. Watching the way the world markets have reacted the last few weeks, if we give them another year like they want, the uncertainty will have us all dead and buried alive.

    2014 could not come soon enough. The odd thing is, much like how no matter what the polls said and was so obvious during last election, they demanded Romney will win the Presidency and had the whole base demanding they didn't lose even after the election was over and Obama won by 5 million votes even taking some surprise conservative states.

    'They' just refuse to get it, no matter what the cost to the nation or their party. They are inescapably daft.

     

Videos