Printer friendly version |  E-mail to a friend 
| Text Size: A A A A
 
Published Friday, February 27, 2009 6:05 AM

After a 74-year delay, Wiley and SMU debate

DALLAS -- Seventy-four years after their meet was canceled, teams from Wiley College and Southern Methodist University finally got their chance to debate.

The two schools met on the SMU campus in Dallas on Wednesday night and debated whether the terrorist detention facility at Guantanamo Bay should be shut down. SMU won, 3-0, but people who participated in the debate say that didn't matter.

"Just in having this debate we are all winners because we have overcome a history of racism and divisiveness," SMU debate coach Ben Voth said in Wednesday's online edition of The Dallas Morning News. "We consider this a meeting of an unfulfilled promise."

The two schools were supposed to debate in 1935, but that was called off, possibly amid negative publicity surrounding Melvin B. Tolson, who led the all-black college's elite debate team. From 1929 to 1939, the Wiley College team debated 75 times and lost only once. The small, historically black college in Marshall went on to beat the national champion University of Southern California in 1935.

Wiley College had to figure out what to do when students from across the country wanted to join its team -- which ceased to exist around World War II -- after the success of Denzel Washington's 2007 film The Great Debaters. The school used a $1 million gift from Washington to restart the team under new coach Shannon LaBove.

"It has been a whirlwind with all the media attention," LaBove said. "I'm proud of my students for handling it so well."

LaBove has said she expects the team to be nationally competitive within a couple of years.

The new Wiley College team did an exhibition debate at Oklahoma City University in October to commemorate the 1931 meeting between the two teams, believed to have been the first interracial debate in the South.

Marshall is a city of about 24,000, located 140 miles east of Dallas.




Notice about comments: Theeagle.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Theeagle.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not theeagle.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here. The Eagle is proud to offer our users enhanced commenting features. You can now build user-to-user connections, follow friend's recent posts, add an avatar that fits your personality, and more. If you have posted here before you’ll need to sign up again and if you’ve never posted start now by signing up!
Comments
[comment]
0 comment(s) found!




The Eagle's Most Popular
  • Commented
  • Emailed
  • Viewed

Top Ads
  • Jobs
  • Cars
  • Homes
  • Merchandise
 
 
Straw Poll
College Station voters have voted down the city's red light cameras. Will you be more likely to run a yellow or red light once the cameras are removed?
  • Yes
  • No

Disclaimer: The Eagle's polls are not based on scientifically valid survey methodology. They are merely a way to allow readers to express opinions on current events.

© 2009 The Bryan College Station Eagle
Contact Us | Subscribe/Customer Care | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | FAQ | Corrections | RSS Feeds | E-mail News