The Eagle - Your digital news leader
Saturday, July 04, 2009
   Daily Archives   SU | MO | TU | WE | TH | FR | SA              RSS      Mobile Edition      Daily Email Updates
   
 
Printer friendly version | E-mail to a friend | 0 1 comment(s) |


Published Friday, July 04, 2008 6:05 AM

Ex-science director sues TEA over firing

AUSTIN -- A former science curriculum director for the Texas Education Agency has filed a federal lawsuit alleging that she was illegally fired for forwarding an e-mail about a speaker who was critical of teaching a controversial alternative to evolution.

Christina Comer, who lost her job at the TEA last year, said in the suit filed Wednesday against the TEA and Education Commissioner Robert Scott that she was terminated for defying an unconstitutional policy that required employees to be neutral on the subject of creationism -- the biblical interpretation of the origin of human life.

The e-mail, which was intercepted by a state education leader, was about a speaker coming to Austin who had critical views of creationism and the teaching of intelligent design.

Federal courts have ruled that teaching creationism as science in public schools is illegal under the U.S. Constitution's provision preventing government establishment or endorsement of religious beliefs.

"The agency's 'neutrality' policy has the purpose or effect of endorsing religion, and thus violates the Establishment Clause," the lawsuit said.

A TEA spokeswoman would not comment on the lawsuit.

The lawsuit seeks a court order overturning the TEA's neutrality policy on teaching of creationism, declaring Comer's dismissal unconstitutional and reinstating her in her former job.

In her complaint, Comer said that the actions of the TEA were unconstitutional and based on political motivations to support creationism.

Intelligent design is the belief that the origin of the universe and humans can best be explained by an unknown "intelligent cause" rather than through evolutionary processes such as natural selection and random mutation. Critics, including at least one federal judge, contend that intelligent design is nothing more than creationism and has no business being taught in science classes.



Notice about comments:
TheEagle.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. TheEagle.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not theeagle.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Full terms and conditions can be read here.



Comments


(Requires free registration.)

1 comment(s) found!


Posted by: On: 7/5/2008

Comment Title:
Why must I make a decision based on ambiguous and unverifiable information to gain reward and avoid punishment, for eternity?




    MOST POPULAR

 
    TOP ADS
  • Jobs
  • Cars
  • Homes
  • Merchandise



© 2008 The Bryan College Station Eagle
Contact Us | Subscribe/Customer Care | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | FAQ | Corrections | RSS Feeds | E-mail News