WASHINGTON — Jane Fonda has never been content to raise hell only from the comfort of Los Angeles. The 81-year-old actress, activist and exercise phenom is moving to Washington for four months with a plan to get arrested. A lot. Maybe every week. Grandmas like her, Fonda says, need to get in the arena fighting global warming with the likes of Swedish activist Greta Thunberg.
Fonda plans a series of teach-ins and weekly rallies in front of the Capitol, the first of which takes place Friday. She stopped by the Los Angeles Times’ Washington bureau to talk about the launch of her latest celebrity-packed action, where Jerry Brown inspired (and didn’t), and Fonda’s secret plot to engage Pamela Anderson in winning Trump over to the side of science. Here’s what she had to say — lightly edited for clarity.
Question: What moved you to do this?
Answer: I read Naomi Klein’s new book. It’s called “On Fire: The (Burning) Case for a Green New Deal.” (One of the things about the book that really changed my life) was the way she wrote about Greta. I mean, I knew about Greta, I didn’t know she was on the spectrum. And I didn’t really understand what Asperger’s meant. And when Naomi described it, I realized that here is this young person who … she’s not influenced by what other people think. … On the spectrum, if they are interested in something, they have a laser focus on that and whatever the denials and rationalizations the rest of us indulge in, that doesn’t come into play with her. And she read the (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) report and she realized that the crisis was barreling straight at us, like a train, and looked around and people weren’t behaving appropriately. It so traumatized her that she stopped eating. I hadn’t realized that she stopped eating and speaking for almost a year. And that really hit me.
Q: Do you worry these protests could further polarize Americans on this issue?
A: I do canvassing, knocking on doors in places like Scranton, Pa. There’s some people you’ll not convince. But we want to reach the people who know it’s a man-made problem, know it exists, but they don’t know what to do. And kind of (give a) sense of urgency. Lift that to more action.
Look what the students did. We don’t want to just go silent. … They still have the torch, but the grandmas are taking it now and continuing it right up until the key thing, which is next November.
Q: Then what?
A: We have to hold their feet to the fire. When (Gov. Jerry Brown) came in, in the ’70s, it was great. Suddenly, you could afford solar panels and all these kinds of windmills. I even had a windmill. But he was focused on the consumption side — use less, cut back, change over to renewables, which is very important. But he wasn’t good on the supply side. For whatever reason, I don’t understand. Right to the day he left, he didn’t pay too much attention to the fact that oil companies are drilling all over California next to communities and next to schools and everything.
Jerry’s complicated. There’s a lot I never could understand. But I love him. I mean, he’s just fascinating.
Q: You owned a windmill?
A: Yeah, I had a children’s camp with Tom Hayden up above Santa Barbara. We got some of our electricity from photovoltaic cells, but we had a windmill that generated electricity.
Q: What changes will your rallies demand?
A: The most important is to stop all new leasing permits for any fossil fuel development on public lands and waters. Because no matter what we do, if that doesn’t stop, we’re doomed. No. 2: gradual phaseout over 30 years with a fair transition. That means … all of those people who worked for the fossil fuel industry get decent union jobs … that can support a family.
The fossil fuel industry is going to have to leave trillions and trillions of dollars in the ground, and they’re going to be asked to pay for the mess they’ve made. And I have not an iota of compunction about the fact that we should insist on that. Because if they had told the truth 30 years ago, the transition could have been moderate, could have been incremental. But because they lied and covered up what they knew, now what we have to do is radical.
Q: Is there a role for Hollywood to play?
A: I don’t know, I’m not even thinking about it. Whatever they do, it’s too slow.
Q: Why four months in D.C.?
A: Well, I went to Ted Sarandos, who’s the (chief content officer) of Netflix, and I asked him if he could give me a year off — a year’s hiatus from “Grace and Frankie” — so I could do this for a year. And he tried, and he couldn’t because of the contracts. I mean, there’s a lot of actors in the mix. And so four months is what I could get. And then when we finish, it’ll be a longer season because it’s our last season. Then I’ll come right back.
Q: Who else is involved in this?
A: 350.org, Greenpeace, Climate Action Network, Friends of the Earth, Oil Change International. A lot of really good groups. I’m just amazed everybody that I’ve called, every scientist, every expert, every celebrity, has said yes, I want to come. And it’s just a question of fitting them in.
Q: “Jane Fonda’s Workout” was created to fund your early activism?
A: It was in the ’70s. There was this terrible recession. It was very hard to raise money. I read an article about Lyndon LaRouche because he hounded me in the airports — “Feed Jane Fonda to the Whales,” “Jane Fonda Leaks More Than Three Mile Island,” etc. The article said that he funded his whole operation with this computer business. I said to Tom (Hayden), “Let’s start a business.” …We actually considered opening a restaurant. … That would have been a disaster. … I understood acting and I understood exercise. And so it was exercise. Everything is timing.
Q: Do you nudge writers to plug climate change into their scripts?
A: Yeah, I will. I will. They don’t like to be nudged. And episodic television is — I learned very quickly — is a totally different animal. … It’s been six years, but it’s something that I don’t really understand. I don’t know. I shouldn’t … Nevermind. (“Grace and Frankie‘s”) a big hit. Lily (Tomlin) and I say, “We’ll take it.”
Q: Does America see you differently than it did in the 1970s?
A: Unlike (with) my earlier activism, I have a hit series at my back. It’s so much easier for me. People like me! I used to do this (in the Vietnam era), and chunks of my hair would literally be pulled out.
It really makes a difference to have a hit TV series, not a hit movie. … Television is in your room all the time and so it really has an effect. And if they like your character and they like the story, then they like you. Lily is going to join me. And Sam Waterston.
Q: Martin Sheen?
A: He might. I should ask him.
Q: Who do you want to see in the White House in 2020?
A: I’m not going to tell you. But I’ll give you a few hints. It’s too late for moderation. Well, you know who that rules out. And I think diversity is important. And we need somebody that has a plan — not that I’m naming names.
Q: You’ve met Trump?
A: Yeah! When he was married to Marla (Maples).
A: When he became the nominee, I thought, well, that’s good, because he’s not ideological. You know, this will be easy. I did not expect it would be this bad. I didn’t.
I tried to get to him on the climate right afterwards. … I know men like him. Not as bad, but I know men like him. And the ego is a big thing. So I thought I’m going to go in there with some gorgeous woman climate activists. I talked to Pamela Anderson, for example. And if she has to get on her knees and just say, “You’re going to be a hero. You can save the world.”
So I called the son-in-law, Jared (Kushner). And I told him what I wanted to do. And he said, “Well, (my wife), Ivanka, is the environmentalist in the family.” And so I called her. And she said, “Well, I’ll see what I can do.” Nothing.
But I realize now. A group of gorgeous women next to the industry that has given him all the money and power … we couldn’t possibly have held up. Pamela was ready to do it. And I’m desperate. I’ll do anything.
©2019 Los Angeles Times
Visit the Los Angeles Times at www.latimes.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
PHOTO (for help with images, contact 312-222-4194):FONDA-QA